Peer Feedback in Reviewing Essay
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Learning by Reviewing through Peer Feedback Refinement
In a controlled experiment using Comrade, a computer-supported peer review system, we explored whether a simple manipulation of the reviewing process could improve the reviewers’ understanding of an author’s essay topic and thus improve the quality of the reviews as well as the reviewer’s own subsequent draft. Student reviewers were randomly assigned either to an original-feedback condition, wh...
متن کاملAccountability in peer assessment: examining the effects of reviewing grades on peer ratings and peer feedback
We examined the influence of accountability on the consistency of peer ratings and quality of peer feedback by comparing three conditions: only rating accountability, only feedback accountability, or both rating and feedback accountability. From a large undergraduate course, 287 students’ peer ratings and peer feedback were coded for rating consistency, comment helpfulness, amount of feedback, ...
متن کاملCharge for peer reviewing
“There’s no such thing as a free lunch” is an adage described over one century ago, which became popular by Professor Milton Friedman, in 1975. It came to my mind when reading the interesting editorial by Pasternak and Glina.(1,2) Working on both sides, as an author of journals and a reviewer, I am aware of the importance of a good review. It is powerful to enhance the description of results in...
متن کاملThe Peer-Reviewing Game
We model a family of peer-reviewing processes as gametheoretic problems. The model helps to understand elements of existing peer-reviewing procedures, and to predict the impact of new mechanisms. The peer-reviewing for evaluation of scientific results submitted to conferences involves complex decision processes of independent participants. Significant tax-payer money is spent by governments for...
متن کاملJSCI Editorial Peer Reviewing Methodology
The Peer Review Methodology Used in the Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics, and Informatics is Based on three-tier reviews: open (or non-blind), double-blind, and participative reviews. Final acceptance depends of the three kinds of reviews but a paper should be recommended by nonblind reviewers AND blind reviewers in order to be accepted for publication. A recommendation to accept made by non-b...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: SALTeL Journal (Southeast Asia Language Teaching and Learning)
سال: 2019
ISSN: 2614-2864
DOI: 10.35307/saltel.v2i2.26